• Honey Trap #1 at the Supreme Court ~ Who landed in it?

• Honey Trap #2 at the Supreme Court ~ Who is next to fall into the second?

• The Supreme Court suffers terminal damage to its international reputation
~ to the delight of PM Johnson the ‘Architect’ of its demise ?

• A second letter is received from the Registrar of the Supreme Court.

Dear Reader,
as you well know the Bugler and his trusty band have left the scandalously corrupt Court of Appeal behind. Where we have left all those we dealt with in the Dock to have the prepared evidence presented in due process and time to the final arbiters, the Court of Citizen Public.

But before we leave it, of this the Bugler can be certain, the Master of the Rolls Sir Geoffrey and the Lord Chief Justice Burnet cannot claim ignorance, set against the tide of digital evidence which overwhelms them…

And so the Bugler et al approached the final UK haven of Justice, the Supreme Court…

“Behold I see the Haven near at hand
To which I mean my weary course to bend;
Vere the main sheet and bear up to the land
The which afore is fairly to be ken’d.”

Spencer: Fairie Queene.

On a literal level, the poem follows several knights as they mean to examine different virtues…

But it should be said the Bugler had a pragmatic tactical plan, or as Shakespeare wrote it better…

“Experience be a jewel that we have purchased at an infinite rate.”.

The sting in the first Honey Trap was simple based on the principle … ‘that the cat was away’… or perhaps that is what we were meant to believe?

Our corrupt opponents, lacking originality would use the same criminality they thought they were ‘successful’ with at the Court of Appeal; arrogantly assuming that they were dealing with the same poor intellectual capacity as those in command at the Court of Appeal; the hope is that they will be wrong.

Disabled FSV~FMG sent by Recorded Delivery two packages to the President of the Supreme Court Lord Reed; the envelopes were prominently marked “Private and Personal To” and were sent to London and the Crown Office at Edinburgh.

In the fullness of time an odd response was received from the Registrar of the Supreme Court Ms Louise di Mambro in a hand written brown envelope.

•This letter is a criminal forgery misusing Ms Louise di Mambro signature, or perhaps it is not;

• It is a manipulated ‘Template’ Letter purporting to come from the Registrar, or perhaps it did;

• It refers to disabled FSV~FMG ‘Letter’ to Lord Reed but it has no traceable Reference on it, nor does it say who the authorising person was;

• The prior marked ‘Letter’ was in fact 2 X Legal bundles consisting of an Application to Appeal, with £1000.0 fee, with 203 pages of argument in each;

• Under the Telegraph Act 1868 (as amended) these 2X Bundles was criminally interfered with…

• The PO Licence Stamp on the returned envelope will track back to the Registry’s digital log…

• And the free hand writing will provide its author…

The Bugler makes no apology for all these actions for make no mistake about it the Supreme Court’s institutional worldwide reputation is at stake, as indeed is the President and Vice President and the supporting sitting Judges’ personal integrity exposed to Public scrutiny.

There are only three conclusions:

1.Either the Supreme Court and its Judiciary, both individually and collectively are beyond reproach, or are corrupt;

2. If they are beyond reproach, without hesitation or ponder, those involved in this corrupt canker at the Supreme Court must in transparency be immediately identified and treated with the full rigor of the law;

3. The disabled Firefighters, their Widows, and Beneficiaries case must without further delay be placed before a panel of Supreme Court Judges, win or lose, nothing less will suffice.

Honey Trap #2 is Sprung and disabled FSV~FMG receives another ‘Letter’ from the Supreme Court… with a little patience and a considerable amount of investigative journalism, the picture has become much clearer.

But before then it is important to promptly place before the international readership evidence of barefaced corruption at the UK Supreme Court. The documents which follow are points of reference as the Bugler lays out his conclusions which confirm beyond doubt that sadly the UK Supreme Court right at its top is corrupt. No doubt the Reader will return to these documents as the story unfolds. Go Here.

Without doubt there are inmates who are guests of Her Majesty who are rolling about the floor of their ‘pads’ in absolute hysterics. They will say surely no one, especially the Cambridge educated highest Law Lords in the land can be that stupid?

If the Bugler’s experience at the Court of Appeal is anything to go by, well yes they can, and the Bugler respectfully reminds these inmates that some of these illustrious Justices will hear their Appeals on matters cogent to their freedom….Heaven forbid.

Now when the first reply came from Mrs Louise di Mambro the first reaction was that this ‘reply’ came, a la Court of Appeal, from lowly ‘masonic troops’ , rogues at the Registry. But thoughtful reflection is a good habit and perhaps indeed the first reply did actually come from Mrs.Louise di Mambro and those involved but initially we must look at LdM to see what is actually possible.

The lady is a fascinating person having clerked at the House of Lords and no doubt on the promise of promotion moved with the Law Lords from the HoL to the newly formed Supreme Court just across Parliament Square to their new home in 2009 accompanied it seems with her colleague Mr.Ian Sewell who also came on promotion as her Deputy Registrar.

At an early point an awkward issue arose concerning ‘loyalty’ and who they were actually required to be loyal to, namely the President of the Supreme Court, though this issue clearly has not gone away, and old bad habits rarely die hard they have to be eradicated; the canker of corruption is still around as the Bugler already knows and as yet no one can successfully serve to masters; a service which may, or may not, involve the current President of the Supreme Court; time and investigation will as ever reveal all.

So saying it is time to advance to the next Editorial Number 047 which, in old Court speak, lays out the ‘information’ in detail against those involved. Go Here.