• A Fiefdom of Falsehood ;

          • A ‘Flexible’ Biography;

• Simple Perjury;

• The Man Trap & Look Ahead;

• The First Evidence of Falsehood & Fraud;

• Choreography & Consequences of Corruption;

• Self Entrapment by Dissimulation and Deceit;

• The Rogues Responses.

The building of clerk Warren’s ‘Fiefdom of Falsehood’ on the LFRS pension front began in 2007, five years after he slithered under the backdoor of the LFRS SHQ in 2002 as an ‘associate’ of that undeclared criminal Holland the government’s ‘Fire Advisor’.

Perhaps by this time in his life clerk Warren had tried to learn and exercise some degree of social graces including honesty and integrity but the old truism that a leopard never changes its spots still holds good.

What clerk Warren ought to have done when he ‘arrived’ in post, as any accomplished administrator usually does, was to review his terms of reference which included a major responsibility which was his delegation as the Lancashire Firefighters Pension Scheme manager, but being the lazy and the inept ‘administrator’ he clearly is , he did not.

So in fact in 2006/7 he could not state, nor did he have the vaguest notion, what the administrative health of the Lancashire Firefighters Pension Scheme was, though by 2007 he had another criminal ‘associate’ of Holland’s in post, none other than ‘Barbarian’ Hamilton who was supposed with Hutchinson to be in charge of the day to day running of the Lancashire Firefighters Pension Scheme but they also failed to carry out a Pension Scheme health audit  because quite simply neither had not the foggiest notion how or where to begin such was the competency level in Pension Management in the LFRS.

But this is not about these ‘administrators’ or their legion of corrupt management failures, this is about why all those involved, or who became involved in the fight for their employment survival, found themselves, whether they liked it or not, as corrupt labourers helping clerk Warren build his Fiefdom of Falsehood within the LFRS where they all commenced to live unhappily together for the next 9 years until clerk Warren as the pressure for Public accountability, one by one as the Bugler predicted, assassinated them and their careers.

Harold the LFRS solicitor recently being the latest to ‘walk the plank’.

Next, as we shall see, clerk Warren he will turn his attention in his survival to ‘his’ politicians or those he thinks he controls.

Watch how he throws DeMolfetta to the Public and Political wolves by the simple expedient of stating that he has, throughout, regularly informed DeMolfetta of all that he proposed and that in response he received authorisation from him to implement these proposals.

Now this will be a gargantuan struggle for individual survival as we shall see shortly.

So much for honour among thieves.

The unholy alliance in this monumental pension debacle included the political Leaders of the LCC of all Parties commencing with CC Driver(Con); the resident Chairman of the Fire Authority commencing with a, lazy as ever, CC Wilkinson(Lab); the resident CFO commencing with a predatorial Holland; LFRS staff including Mattinson, Harold, Hutchinson; Wakefield;Gardiner; and LCC staff including Lister and Wisdom the pension ‘experts’.

Why was it necessary to engage in such a massive cover up and what was it meant to achieve, and for whose benefit was it carried out?

For one can rest assured it was not for the benefit of Lancashire’s disabled FSV, their Widows or their Beneficiaries?

In childhood we are taught many lesson of decency and heroism including the tale of the boy in the Netherlands strolling home from school one day with his school chums.

He noticed a slight trickle of water from a life protecting dyke and aware of the horror a failure could bring to his family and community he, with his young friends, held their hands over the holes until adult help could arrive, well knowing that if it did not then they were all doomed …but help did arrive and the day was saved…such is decency in all its forms though it seems little Warren was not around when these common humanities and values were being taught.

So when did this pension debacle actually commence and was its ‘detection’ the consequence of vigilant pension administration led by clerk Warren and his cronies with robust checks in place which led to its discovery?

Unfortunately not…

On Monday 27^th November 2006 disabled FSV-DW(deceased) contemporaneous notes state that he phoned  the relevant pensions authorities informing them that his wife would shortly become age 60 and his DWP benefit circumstances would change and that they should take note and action.

On Tuesday 27^th June 2007, 7 months later, Wisdom wrote and spoke to disabled FSV-DW informing him he had been ‘overpaid’ and that his Injury Award had been stopped and that he owed in the region of £30,000.0. which he was required to pay back.

No mention was made of ‘underpayments’ the horror of which was to come later.

In the 7 months which had elapsed Wisdom et al had time to get their cover up story right.

A cover up of their monumental maladministration which involved several £million pounds of overpayment and underpayment, but a cover up which ensured the preservation of a blameless individual reputation and more importantly preserved their employment, whilst perversely blaming the victims, like  disabled FSV-DW, for not reporting to them changes in their personal circumstances, for which they had no Statutory obligation to do so, just an innate sense of decency.

Three months later on Monday 24^th September 2007 clerk Warren reported to the Full Committee of the Fire Authority that, and one is required to assume his robust pension management vigilance for this story line, that he(the hero) had identified a series of serious pension anomalies which he then, with CC Wilkinson (a former Firefighter receiving an ill health pension which he blatantly denied) proceeded to lay the blame squarely on the shoulders of the disabled Fire Service Veterans even though they knew from the Personal Record Files(PRF) of individual FSVs that they had been regularly informed of DWP changes which they had singularly failed to   take action on.

From that moment forward access to these precious PRF records had to be obstructed and suppressed at all costs.

Indeed they immediately ‘lost’ disabled FSV-DW PRF, found it again, and irretrievably lost it forever, so they said, when he died which they cynically knew he was going to, because he was terminally ill with cancer at the time.

This was the very first of many criminal acts clerk Warren and his ‘associates’ engaged in.

Thus with one selfish serf serving falsehood and a criminal act did clerk Warren and his ‘associates’ set themselves irredeemably on the criminal trail of employment preservation and self-preservation above all else including the law which continues to this very day.

An ethos of institutionalised falsehood and criminality which laid the foundations for years of falsehood and criminality which became necessary to defend not only their continued employment but to substantiate the original falsehood and crime of ‘loss’ of disabled FSV-DW Pension Scheme documents which could reveal their collective criminality.

It has been said that when one gets to the tenth falsehood one forgets the original base lie but this article should remind clerk Warren and his ‘associates’  that they collectively made the original mendacious choices and regardless of the elapse of time responsibility continues to rest individually and entirely with them and those who for their own selfish individual political reasons chose to support this mendacious criminality.

Accountability is also timeless.

Not for the likes of clerk Warren and his cronies to place their hands over the flaws in the dyke of their gross ineptitude. Not for them to hold up their hands and accept responsibility. Not for them in decency to find a heroic honest solution whatever the cost in personal or collective integrity or reputation.  Not for them to consider the shocking impact their failed administration had on disabled FSV, their Widows and Beneficiaries.

Only for clerk Warren and his ‘associates’ the self-serving self-preserving claim to the high ground of falsehood whilst drowning disabled FSVs in their subsequent sea of stinking corruption.

A leopard does indeed never changes its spots…a life built on a series of mammoth and continuous dissimulation coupled with mendacity…what an epitaph for any human being…

When a casual Reader reads clerk Warren’s ever changing ‘flexible’ biography, more mythology than fact, one could be forgiven for thinking that this is a responsible local authority civil servant who by dint of hard work and assiduous integrity has risen from humble beginnings as a British Rail clerk to his current ‘role’ at the LFRS.

But that is what he wants such an admiring Reader to think.

But is it actually the truth, bearing in mind the supporting evidence TMB has regularly produced and will continue to produce that clerk Warren, as an accomplished dissimulator and pathological liar takes a grain of truth and allows the Reader to build this disinformation it into a castle of his or her own illusions, in effect a castle built of sand on sand.

For example, why does clerk Warren not claim that he was Head of Employee Relations within British Rail choosing instead to carefully claim ‘ with responsibility for the Employee Relations of 35,000 staff’, which is hardly the same thing, is it?

Perhaps he is just being modest?

But as ever an accomplished dissimulator, which he demonstrably is, he allows the Reader to form the conclusion he wants them to form but based on manipulated, planted dissimulation, coupled with oily falsehood.

All rather clever, but a confidence trick nonetheless.

When British Rail was privatised clerk Warren then claims he became Director of Human Resources for the Rail North West leading the casual Reader to assume that he continued to be ‘responsible for these self-same 35,000 employees. But he carefully does not states so.

He allows the Reader to reach that incorrect, and uncorrected, assumption. All rather clever and how he must laugh behind peoples backs at their innocent stupidity.

It seems hard to contemplate that as an apparently successfully Human Resources manager of such magnitude that he would then demote himself  with the income diminution that this would involve by placing himself in charge of a mere few hundred semi-academics in Poole on the South Coast.

Perhaps he was home sick?

The reality, which the Bugler predicted, was much more prosaic as we have recently seen in the cases of Hamilton and Gardiner which bear a remarkable similarity in the ‘objective’ to be achieved which is a ‘cooling off’ move, a hiding away from scrutiny move, because just one phone call informs the Bugler that when he left North West Rail clerk Warren had set back industrial relations so far, decades was suggested, that it became a ‘jump or pushed’ scenario and he chose to jump.

Of course after the necessary ‘cooling off’ period hidden from northern scrutiny in the deep south he magically, by the use of his Lamplighter ‘handshake’, reappears in his ‘adopted’ North West at Manchester City Council as an ‘umble clerk once more on his way, via another Lamplighter Holland, to and through the backdoor of the LFRS in April 2002 where in ascendency he is once more in charge of human resources to the tune of 1000 employees which seems a long way down in ego deflation from the 35,000 employees he originally claimed.

It is all a very odd ‘success’ story…

So, the modus operandii clerk Warren favours is making statements of sweeping generalisations with nearly truthful grains of sand which actually informs the Reader nothing about what, in old fashioned truth, he was actually responsible for, or what indeed he is actually qualified to do, if anything, but allowing the casual observer to reach all the wrong  uncorrected conclusions.

Clerk Warren is indeed a really Artful Dodger…

In the January 2013 Court case which involved the Bugler, which we will inexorably get to in detail as TMB closes in on clerk Warren’s demonstrable criminality, Warren slumped insouciantly  in the Witness Box under Oath without being invited to sit down; an indicator of his contempt for all things Judicial, or because he already knew he had HH Judge Philip Butler in his pocket which remains an interesting aspect of their ‘relationship’.

In responding to the Litigant-in-Person’s(The Bugler) questions concerning his pension management  qualifications to run and manage the substantial Lancashire Firefighters Pension Scheme clerk Warren mumbled that he had an MBA from Lancaster University and because that was such an illustrious qualification it ‘qualified’ him for the delegated powers he had received from the Fire Authority via the Chief Fire Officer to be the Lancashire Firefighters Pension Scheme Manager.

Of course an MBA has nothing whatsoever to do with Pension Scheme management nor does it bring with it the quintessential skills or knowledge to engage in such a task.

These statements which HH Judge ‘Nelson’ Butler ‘bought’ were of course simply Perjury.

An MBA, or if your prefer an M.B.A., a Master of Business Administration, or if you prefer a Master’s Degree in Business Studies, was a class of degree which you might imagine originated in the USA where as we well know a ‘degree’ can be ‘bought over the counter’ being described on one memorable occasion as being found in a Kellogg’s corn flake package.

An MBA has also been described as a ‘terminal degree’ which sounds about right and in keeping with Wisdom the Fire Service ‘Pension Expert’ and her claimed ‘degree’ which when eventually it is publicly scrutinised by her employers the LCC will be found to be just as false as clerk Warren’s MBA is.

It seems strange that a search of the illustrious alumnii of the Lancaster University Management School fails to reveal an enrolled postgraduate student named Warren because before one can obtain an MBA one has to have a recognised qualifying Degree in one subject or another for entry to an MBA course which of course clerk Warren simply does not possess, or indeed is there listed a successful Masters Degree(MBA) in the name of Warren?

One would have thought that having , as it were, climbed the academic hill successfully clerk Warren would have been mighty proud of his academic accomplishments and would unhesitatingly have proclaimed it by the use of ‘MBA’ in his post nominals after his name and most particularly in his LFRS biography just before his grandiose self-authored title?

But, curiously, he does not.

Perhaps, as usual, the Bugler has got all this wrong and clerk Warren is simply a very modest working class hero made good?

Of course, dear Reader, as you might have already guessed this is all pure self-delusional bunkum and not happy with deluding himself this narcissist has spent most of his working life deluding those around him including a rather stupid, or corrupt, Circuit Court Judge called Butler or as we like to know him as ‘Nelson’ Butler.

It was set against this Gilbert & Sullivan 4 day Court case background that a significant fact was unearthed by a barrister, a Life Member of the Inner Temple Bar, during which it emerged that the LFRS and its forebears had been underpaying the wrong pensions for decades to those who were injured in its Service and had been forcibly ejected from their employment, adding insult to actual injury, by underpaying these disabled FSVs with an ‘Ordinary’ Rule B1 pension instead of the correct(enhanced) ill-health Rule B3 and Injury Rule B4 pensions.

As you might expect the Court and ‘Nelson’ Butler was not prepared to address this significant and thoroughly unpleasant discovery which clearly had not been factored into the LFRS ‘choreography’ .

In the event Butler simply rejected the submitted documents and instructed clerk Warren that he was to respond to the Bugler after the conclusion of the case which he was distinctly unhappy about doing as the correspondence which follows clearly confirms.

Indeed twice in Court, following 2 requests and 2 directions from Butler to clerk Warren, he was reluctantly forced to engage in this new question which simply was…

“Why in contravention of Statutory Instrument 129 Rule B1(c) are you underpaying me the wrong pensions?”

Planning well ahead the Bugler envisaged that this matter of his underpaid pension would, once more, involve clerk Warren in extensive dissimulation and falsehood along the long road of Statutory IDRP in the voyage to the Office of the Pensions Ombudsman.

The question was not whether clerk Warren would be mendacious, but whether or not he and his associate Winterbottom would be brass necked enough to entrap themselves, and indeed as the record shows they did.

It was therefore not necessary to set a ‘man trap’ for them, bearing in mind that Winterbottom was, and remains, a fine upstanding member of the establishment as a H.M. Deputy Lieutenant of Lancashire and thus a member of the Judiciary and most certainly that is how both he and Warren know, and have access to, ‘Nelson’ Butler.This interesting relationship…

So what has Justice or the Truth got to do with anything?

The correspondence which follows lays out the simple questions in law for clerk Warren to answer but as we well know he is simply incapable of either understanding the law or its application and thus he relies on his ‘experts’  Lister & Wisdom to chant their mantra of the law which is invariable wrong.

We should consider two points at this juncture.

Firstly, clerk Warren depends on Lister and Wisdom supporting his position which is rather unique for him because they do not come under his control and their ‘relationship’ regularly collapses into angry hysterical unpleasant finger pointing when Lister and Wisdom employment and perks come under threat as a result of the exposure of their inextricably linked joint criminal activities with clerk Warren.

This is an exemplar of an unholy alliance and when the time comes, as it will, for individual survival clerk Warren would do well not to rely on Lister and Wisdom toeing the line of deceit.

Much will be at stake including all their personal freedom.

Secondly, as time advances and those in clerk Warren’s ‘sphere of corruption’ wise up as they watching the progressive assassinations creep nearer to them, including politicians.

An increasingly isolated clerk Warren is now driven to depend on the child like skills of another  clerk, Nolan who knows absolutely nothing about pension law and who seems to occupy his spare time at his employment in Wilmslow preparing silly drafts of civil rights eroding proposals which have been passed to the ICO for an Opinion on illicit data retention because there are clear areas of interest where Nolan in the pursuit of censoring TMB and the Lancashire disabled FSVs dissenters proposes the retention of secret lists of these democratic protestors opposed to LFRS oppressive public misconduct. Go Here.

In digressing, Readers may recall disabled FSV-RRB complaint fully supported with documented evidence of rampant corruption discovered in his forced release PRF in respect of his pension.

This Complaint which was ‘closed down’ by a corrupt Nolan in complicity with clerk Warren and Chairman DeMolfetta that the Complaint… “had no merit”, well they would, would they not?

But that corrupt act will bring its price in an addition to the charges of impeachment to be laid against DeMolfetta for failing to present the complete Complaint to the Full Committee of the Fire Authority for its deliberations in a classical demonstration of dissimulation which was intended and did succeed in deliberately misleading the elected Members of the Fire Authority.

How can they decide any Public Complaint if they do not have before them all the evidence?

Nolan who remains under 6 months watch from the Solicitors Regulation Authority would be well advised just to take the stipend of Taxpayers monies and slither back , as CC O’Toole once charmingly put it … ‘under his rock’, with the Taxpayers money he gets for doing precious little.

This jungle is not for the likes of naïve and corrupt junior solicitors with their ‘flexible’ ideas of Civil Rights because a large beast called ‘Liberty’ stalks the undergrowth to whom this example of his creative talents have been forwarded for their agreed interest …

Following the revelation by the Bugler’s barrister that it was clear that the LFRS had since the inception of the Bugler’s Pensions(and others) on 1^st February 1997 been in breach of Statutory Instrument No:129 Rule B1(c), which specifically prohibits,  the payment of a Rule B1 Ordinary pension  if  he  had been ‘awarded’ an enhanced compensating ill-health Rule B3 and Injury Award Rule B4 pensions on his compulsory retirement by the Fire Authority.

This has been the inescapable point of law on which the LFRS and its pensions Contractor the LCC ‘Your Pension Service’(YPS) are perpetually unable to answer and have repeatedly boxed themselves into a corner by denying the existence of the prohibition of Rule B1 (c) and its unambiguous provision.

Put simply the Fire Authority cannot pay a Rule B1 Ordinary pension if it has awarded a Rule B3 and/or a Rule B4 pension.It must pay the compensating package which it has awarded.

In the case of disabled FSV-FG the YPS(Wisdom) finally agreed that the law Rule B1 (c) prohibited such a course of action but then she reversed herself, probably counting on her ‘Degree’  legal knowledge, by then insisting that she could, by misreading Rule B3 Paragraphs 4 & 5, which she says allows her to paying a B1 Ordinary pension contravening the law which specifically states she cannot.

Normal logic and the Statute Law, which could not be clearer, defies such illogicality. The LFRS knows full well that what it is doing is wrong but persists in defying the obvious which cannot be clearer.

The LFRS is breaking the Statute Law when it pays a B1 Ordinary pension in substitution for an ill-health/injury B3/B4 pension.

What can be clearer?

After the conclusion in February/March of the case of LFRS -v- Burns the Defendant (the Bugler) made a final attempt, in the complete absence of any by the Claimant(LFRS) to bring their pension shambolic debacle to a halt by once more proposing a formal Resolution Mechanism. Go Here.

This ignored proposal came on top of a shameful miscarriage of  justice, of which more later, but whether the LFRS liked it or not, post trial, they  now found themselves as a consequence of the cack handed ‘management’ of his own Court by ‘Nelson’ Butler  with a new and greater element of the  Public threat of exposure of not only their cover up of their maladministration; the Public exposure in Court of the independently witnessed and recorded choreographed suborning and coaching under Oath of their own principle Witness Ms.J. Drinkall MBE; but in addition the revealed fact that the LFRS and their pension providing contractors the LCC had been underpaying the wrong pensions to hundreds of their disabled FSVs and their Beneficiaries for decades.

Truly, their collective choreography of corruption went totally awry.

Such was their collective intent to ‘do the Bugler down’ that the LFRS and ‘Nelson’ Butler failed to get their choreography onto the one Directions sheet and as a consequence their plastic ducks bobbed aimlessly around bumping into each other in Court on this turgid puddle of nasty corruption for all to see, including the Public in the Court Gallery.

In fact in the end the LFRS, the Court , and ‘Nelson’ Butler now found themselves tripping over each other reading from two editions of a corrupt dance sheet which produced a hilarious and an even greater predicament when the Court under ‘Nelson’ Butler in his haste to avoid having to deal with this last minute significant  pension issue, which he was asked to do in an Application, and which he had already decided was to be dealt with under Part II of the trial never, in the end, actually allowed the Defendant(the Bugler) to get to the point where he could present his Defence and Counterclaim(the new pension issue) which not only contradicted ‘Nelson’ Butler’s own jointly agreed Directions of the trail procedure agreed at the commencement of the trial but which in the end led to his total abandonment Part II entirely, which is of course a simple denial of Justice to the Defendant and thus a mistrial.

The Bugler looks forward with enthusiasm to presenting this travesty of British Justice to its international Readership and of course the UK’s Lord Chief Justice and Solicitor General again, only this time publicly the pair having already denied that this farce ever took place.

Meantime as you may recall some good was come all this shenanigans by ‘Nelson’ Butler, though with corrupt motives, ordering the LFRS twice in Court, following 2 requests and 2 directions from Butler to clerk Warren which required him to reluctantly engage in this new pension question which simply was…

“Why in contravention of Statutory Instrument 129 Rule B1 are you underpaying me the wrong pensions since 1997?”

This was clerk Warren’s first attempt at a response with his ally and pension ‘expert’ Wisdom. You will note of course he leaves Wisdom in the frame should the going get sticky later because he knows nothing about pensions for all his bluster and bullying. Go Here.

It was at this early point that the Bugler’s pro bono barrister clearly intervened to write on the Bugler’s behalf stating the categorical legal position and whilst it is a heavy read, time, and patient re-reading lays out the clear case that the LFRS, and in all probability because of the ‘monkey see monkey do’ factor, many other Fire Authorities imitating Lancashire’s unlawful policy, or vice versa, have also been underpaying the wrong pensions for decades to their disabled FSVs, Widows, and Beneficiaries.

This letter is underpinned and replicated by the Barrister’s 3 Opinions published on TMB subsequently.Go Here.

 It is worth bearing in mind that Mr.J.M.Copplestone-Bruce remains a Life Member of the Inner Temple Bar and thus free to practice perpetually and at his professional national apogee would not consider looking at a ‘Brief’ for less than £100k.

We are indebted to him for his great personal zeal and his raison detre, the pursuit of Justice and fair play.

For the letter Go Here.

Of course, with a reasonable Pension Scheme Manager the natural expectation would be that clerk  Warren would seek a contra barrister’s Opinion and leave them to argue the legal minutiae until an agreed conclusion could be reached but clerk Warren was so far entrenched in saving his own employment to risk any further exposure to the law and truth after the near shave in the Court and having no money in the pot he turned to Harold to write a response because it is inconceivable that a barrister would risk being disbarred for the likes of Warren by writing such a response.

It is clear that this letter stating the correct legal position caught clerk Warren on the back foot simply because of his complete ignorance of the applicable pension law and because he already had more than enough on his plate when faced by a probable Appeal against the recent Court decision.

However, a response would have to give the impression of being similarly ‘heavyweight’ thus creating the appearance that it had been written by ‘his’  barrister without revealing that in fact it had been cobbled together by Harold who was also out of his depth in pension law. 

So it was necessary to buy time giving the impression that clerk Warren had consulted a barrister and that this was ‘his’ input in the response. All rather clever but dissimulation and deceit nevertheless. Go Here.

Buying time brought this interesting response. Go Here.

Faced with a proper lawyer the best that could be achieved was to attempt to mislead by deliberately quoting from the wrong 2006 Pensions Scheme in the hope he would get away with it. This tactic simply re-confirmed his arrogance, his stupidity, and his complete ignorance of the Pension Laws he was meant to implement daily in his management of the Lancashire Firefighters Pension Scheme which, by delegation, had been given the direct responsibility for. Go Here.

At this juncture clerk Warren had by dissimulation and deceit placed himself in his own man trap. He was thus fair game and it simply remained to be seen how far in deceit he would go because his modus operandii has always been that once he commences his falsehood he must see it through.

This must be a narcissistic trait and no doubt the psychological experts would have a neat answer to such an obvious characteristic failure of human nature.

The game continued. Go Here.

At this point the final attempt was made by dissimulation and deceit using extracts from the wrong DCLG 2008 Guidance to the 2006 Pension Scheme purporting these to be from the Home Office 1992 Commentary when at a glance even a casual Reader could see that this was the perfect misquote deliberately meant to mislead and confuse the Bugler. But clearly an ignorant clerk Warren was being ‘fed’ by solicitor Harold who thought he was being rather clever and if he was caught out he could quite easily hide behind clerk Warren.Go Here.

What clerk Warren and obviously Harold did at this point, post trial, was formally by Application to seek to strike out the Bugler’s Counterclaim(which in any event had never been heard in Part II of the trial by Butler’s decision) which included this new and major pension issue but following correspondence, by a very alert barrister and a very alert Judge-not a corrupt Butler, the Court this was persuaded not to grant the LFRS Application. Nice try but not good enough…

To this day therefore the Bugler’s Counterclaim, including the issue of being paid the wrong pensions, remains available for future litigation.

And then to where the final trap was set when the Bugler gave the impression that he had bought all this deceit, Go Here.

As the dust settled clerk Warren and solicitor Harold hoped they had done enough in their dissimulation and deceit to persuade and confuse both the Bugler and his Barrister by leading them to conclude that this decent honourable and transparent LFRS and its Pension Scheme manager knew what they were doing in pension management terms and that they could be trusted to, and had, ‘got it right’…but as we well know pigs have yet to grow wings.

So, just to shatter their self inspired delusions, came the next Bugler letter to ensure that their own mantrap fell in on their heads. Go Here.

After his convenient stonewalling holiday, another well exercised technique, clerk Warren/Harold finally had to reply. It seems that the 10^th Liars’ Rule applied. Neither he nor Harold could decipher their own falsehoods in their previous correspondence, as the stumbling bumbling knaves they are,  and simply, as one might expect, they could not remember the  weave of their own web of deceit.  Go Here.

It is appropriate at this point before the Bugler looks at the so called involvement of the LCFA Full Committee in the implementation of the Bugler’s  IDRP Stage II procedure that one ought to be reminded that this is not some childish game  but the endemic and systemic misconduct of local authority civil servants in both the LFRS and the LCC who have been appointed and  placed in positions of Public trust, and in particular, have been placed in charge of substantial Taxpayers monies both national, local, and individual pension contributions which were to be lawfully distributed to those Firefighters and/or their Beneficiaries  who contributed 11% of their gross earning throughout their working lives.

How can it be that for more than 8 years elected Members of three Local Authorities placed in Public office to have responsibility and accountability for these local authority civil servants have not by a single gesture of political responsibility raised a single finger to investigate all these appalling circumstances which have been repeatedly placed before them?

These elected Members cannot either deny individual or corporate responsibility for these criminal activities because they were made fully aware, as the records show, of every single misconduct which was reported to them which raises the question that they ought be impeached and suspended as complete failures of their sworn Public duty…

The following letter, once more, evidentially confirms, as yet another example of these misconducts in public office and calls, one more, for their belated investigation by the elected Members of  Lancashire Combined Fire Authority. Go Here.

On Monday 5th September 2016…

The Prime Minister said in referring to the Vaz affair: ‘I have always been clear throughout my political career that what is important for people is that they feel they are able to have confidence in their politicians.”.

It was interesting to note the equivocation in the responses of the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee to the Vaz antics…”how sad they were”…really, was this because Vaz was exposed as the charlatan, rogue, and hypocrite he actually was?

It is the actions and reactions such as this which continue to confirm in the Electorates’ minds that corruption is now endemic throughout English politics indeed infecting the very corridors of the Houses of Parliament. What chance do decent politicians have to have their voices of transparency and decency heard all all levels if they and the Public see such corruption right at the heart of the lead Home Affairs Committee?

But is it just at governmental level?

Right here and now in Lancashire the Bugler, and those he represents, are putting Labour/Liberal Democrat Coalition of the LCC  to the democratic test.

In late August we placed before the political Leaders of Lancashire CC J.Mein(Labour) and CC B.Winlow(LibDem) informal prima facie cases of Misconduct in Public Office by CC F.DeMolfetta and the senior staff of the LCFA and the LFRS.

The Bugler asked for guidance on the procedure to be followed in formalising this prima facie evidence into the necessary Public charges to be made against Lancashire County Councillor F. DeMolfetta and the procedural route to be followed including the correct LCC Committees to which the necessary documentation would be submitted.

The LCC result thus far is a thundering silence.

No doubt they have been ill advised by the likes of  Young and his ‘associates’ to wait and see what the Bugler will do.

Non engagement, stonewalling, and the failure to take the necessary Statutory action places both CC J.Mein(Labour) and CC B.Winlow(LibDem) in the same ‘dock’ which CC D.Molfetta will find himself in. It is an unwise political decision as we march to next May’s LCC elections.

Vaz’s response was naturally to brazen it out and smirk as he goes and these are the routine theatricals the Electorate expect.

Here is the LFRS response by another rogue and liar, clerk Warren. What else could he do? Be honest? Go Here.

Because of a complete  vote of No Confidence by the disabled FSVs and their Beneficiaries in Lancashire in the Labour/Liberal Democrat Coalition of the LCC the time has surely arrived when it is necessary to put a new Conservative Prime Minister to the test over the Public failure of accountability by a Labour/Lib-Dem controlled LCC and a Labour/Lib-Dem controlled LFRS by asking her and her officials to look at Lancashire with, at the very least,  a Ministerial Inquiry.

Next Chapter 14 on ‘A Journey of Truth’ as two clerks set out to successfully deceive an IDRP Stage II Applicant disabled FSV-PB; their Fire Authority; and finally either a corrupt, or more likely stupid, former Pensions Ombudsman called King, Go Here.