• Disabled FSV~FMG ~ The Extraordinary Appeal ~  to the Supreme Court;

• Books ~ And their Colours;

• Perverting the Course of Justice ~ At the Supreme Court;

• The Authors of Criminality the Sorcerer’s Apprentice;

• Hodge and the Lodge ? 

Disabled FSV~FMG ~ The Extraordinary Appeal ~  to the Supreme Court

On the 27th April 2021 disabled FSV~FMG having exhausted the Court of Appeal and its judiciary who perversely obstructed his Applications, for over 15 months, decided that it was time to move on to the Supreme Court no judicial decision of any substance (set against the law governing this case) having been made.

A complete denial of the Dignity of Human Right to Justice by rank closing judicial silence which can only have been instigated by the current government. So much for English justice…but the march forward continues…

Every time a decision is made by the disabled Firefighters, their Widows,  and Beneficiaries and  all those involved with the Bugler there is a palpably rising sense of optimism that affairs at the next Court might offer them their Human Right and Dignity of Justice? Surely it could not get scandalously worse but it did…

Where does this great ‘omerta’ come from in the England Judiciary? Something the English have always associated with these foreign jonnies from the mafia in southern Italy; but the English Judiciary are better at it though as we shall see the Scottish Judiciary are not far behind.

Nevertheless disabled FSV~FMG meticulously prepared his Application once more. It commenced with a cover letter to the President of the Supreme Court Lord Reed accompanied by the standard form and the fee for £1000.0 for the privilege of access to Justice…

A work of some 203 pages telling its story of judicial failure, incompetence within the law about which we pay them handsomely to know, deliberate deceit, chicanery, common laziness, all coated with a good measure of insouciant ‘shrug’ and disdainful arrogance beyond measure…where does this come from…’redbrick universities’… full of privileged know-it-alls who actually have never run or been personally responsible for anything and as has been said recently cannot ‘organise’ horse manure on a shovel…if they could recognise a shovel in the first place.

So this from a Litigant-in-Person, a  disabled Firefighter who Fancourt J thought, and stated, it was all too technical for him, but who can actually not only recognise a shovel can arrange its legal horse manure contents better than Fancourt could.

To prove the point read on…

Use full screen (last but one on the right bottom cnr)…turn the pages-mid points right/left…use ESC on your keyboard to return to normal display…

The next part of the narrative relates the execution of pure criminality and by whom…

In the normality of events disabled  FSV~FMG’s Extraordinary Application to the Supreme Court would be issued, by the Registrar, Mrs Louise di Mambro or her Deputy Mr. Ian Sewell , a Case Number, and Court a procedure would commence.

In the fullness of time his case would be placed before 3 Justices of the Supreme Court to assess if ‘permission’ to appeal would be granted; this hinges on whether or not, his case has an arguable Point, or Points-of-Law.

The normal ‘rule of thumb’ seems to be that if disabled  FSV~FMG Application focused on a simple ‘Point-of-Law’ (his contains a plethora) then he would be ‘Granted’ full rights to Appeal before 5 or more Justices reflecting its national importance; well it certainly matters to around 40,000 Fire and Rescue Service Beneficiaries across the UK and where ever else they might live post Service…

There are of course Court Rules for this procedure and these are to be found in the ‘Green Book’ published by LexisNexis Butterworth (ISBN/ISSN: 9781474317719) £659.99 and/or supported by precedent and case law books in the colloquially named Butterworth’s ‘White Book(s)’ which both DTPO Johnson, Falk J, and Fancourt self evidently failed to consult.

The latter, once more published by LexisNexis Butterworth ‘The Butterworth Costs Service’ (ISBN/ISSN: 9780406996442),£1069.0; ‘Butterworth Civil Court Precedents'(ISBN/ISSN: 9780406048479), £1373.0; as the man on the Clapham Omnibus says … nice work if you can get it … it helps the Bugler as an author/publishers in finding the way through the forest of deceit and love of money.

Now speaking of authors, the Judicature, the Bar, the Court Rules, and impartiality it is to be noted that Mrs Louise di Mambro is the 3rd listed author of the ‘Green Book’ and the 2nd listed author of the Butterworths.

Under the ‘Featured Authors’ by LexisNexis Mrs Louise lists herself as “Registrar of the Supreme Court and Registrar of the Privy Council Office”; there are ‘rules’ in authorship and the Civil Service and publishing that no claims ought to be advanced whereby such an author launches him/herself off the platform of the benefits of a Public Service appointment.

Co-incidentally her husband David di Mambro, a Member of the Bar, is listed as a co-author in her works whilst he also authors an amended set of Court Rules for the Privy Council for such tax havens as the Virgin Islands where no doubt he will bump into his chums from Chancery including the Master of the Rolls Vos and others like Lord Hodge recently appointed as Deputy President of the Supreme Court who seems with others to have a little local difficulty of Declaration of Interests north of the Border with the Noble Nicola?

It also seems the Noble Lord Hodge has some little local difficulty south of the Border where 150’+ politicians of both Houses of Parliament objected to his Deputy Presidential appointment at the Supreme Court in 2020…but as we now know he had, since 2013 at the Supreme Court, and before, been professionally associating with Mrs Louise di Mambro in developing their mutual financial interests which might not necessarily have been lawful…

In digressing , for just for a moment, perhaps the Bugler ought to look at these Hodge ‘difficulties’ and how they have factored into disabled FSV~FMG simple little law case…but before then let us once more look at how Mrs. Louise di Mambro applied ‘her Rules’ to this case in hand.

As Member of the Bar, and thus a barrister herself Mrs.diMambro knew exactly what she was doing when she falsified this official correspondence purporting that it had ultimately emanated from the President of the Supreme Court.

Though with little official public action/reaction in ‘transparency’ (the President’s espoused position) to the contrary on his part in correcting this appalling state of affairs the Bugler is left with the impression that perhaps the President of the Court is complicit and thus tacitly does support these unlawful activities?

Interestingly Mrs.diMambro did not rush to include her chum’s name Lodge in the correspondence on this occasion, perhaps acting on the Hodge self-preservation wish of … ‘do it’ …but keep my name out of it?

The criminal technique is very simple, if unoriginal, based on the ‘cats away’ principle; just like the Registrar at the Court of Appeal. Access to the relevant diary is the key…

So let us run the theory…it will be common knowledge that the ‘boss’ is going on holiday/business, or in the case of the former MoR, away for medical treatment. Allow a few days then send out the letter of denial to disabled FSV~FMG authored on the 19th May 2021 so one can assume that on or about the 17th May 2021 the ‘boss’ went off on holiday/business.

Not only is this another criminal case of forgery but is a gross breach of trust between colleagues and a gross disloyalty to the President of the Court and its good name which has been, and remains, a bone of contention about loyalty which has arisen since the ‘birth’ of the Supreme Court 10 years ago.

How diMambro is going to explain all that away will be an exhibition in bureaucratic gymnastics when all she has been duplicitously engaged in, is exposed as now, Publicly…

This also raises the questions how many times since 2009 has Mrs.diMambro secretly used her sleight of hand trickery in ‘obligement’ to brush off tiresome Appellants and conversely how many times using the same unlawful acts has she opened the doors to the final Appeal Court to those from whom she has later sought ‘favours’ or financial reward from ?

Because Mrs.diMambro writes and single handedly controls the ‘Court Rules’ she can virtually do whatever she likes. This huge authority lodged in the hands of a malleable, nay capricious person, absolutely neuters the triple lock of judicial protection (3 Justices) which all Appellants rely on to have Justice exhibited to them… the legal ramifications of all this fraud are legion and grist to the mills of sharp and courageous investigative journalists in the national media.

For the moment Mrs diMambro may wish to contemplate her personal freedom and future because it is difficult to spend time on idyllic islands behind bars bearing in mind that the documentation, which is in a safe place awaiting collection by Dame Cressida Dick DBE QPM, retains the DNA and fingerprints of all those who not only handled it but coughed on it…

Once more for the Readers the evidence is to be found, Go Here.